Tales written by the most recent model of ChatGPT have been almost pretty much as good as these written by human authors, in keeping with new analysis on the narrative abilities of synthetic intelligence.
However when individuals have been advised a narrative was written by AI—whether or not the true creator was an algorithm or an individual—they rated the story poorly, an indication that individuals mistrust and dislike AI-generated artwork.
“Individuals do not prefer it after they suppose a narrative is written by AI, whether or not it was or not,” mentioned Haoran “Chris” Chu, Ph.D., a professor of public relations on the College of Florida and co-author of the brand new examine. “AI is sweet at writing one thing that’s constant, logical and coherent. However it’s nonetheless weaker at writing participating tales than persons are.”
The standard of AI tales might assist individuals like public well being employees create compelling narratives to succeed in individuals and encourage wholesome behaviors, corresponding to vaccination, mentioned Chu, an professional in public well being and science communication. Chu and his co-author, Sixiao Liu, Ph.D., of the College of Central Florida, printed their findings Sept. 13 within the Journal of Communication.
The researchers uncovered individuals to 2 totally different variations of the identical tales. One was written by an individual and the opposite by ChatGPT. Survey members then rated how engaged they have been with the tales.
To check how individuals’s beliefs about AI influenced their rankings, Chu and Liu modified how the tales have been labeled. Typically the AI story was appropriately labeled as written by a pc. Different instances individuals have been advised it was written by a human. The human-authored tales additionally had their labels swapped.
The surveys centered on two key components of narratives: counterarguing—the expertise of selecting a narrative aside—and transportation. These two story elements work at odds with each other.
“Transportation is a really acquainted expertise,” Chu mentioned. “It is the sensation of being so engrossed within the narrative you do not really feel the sticky seats within the movie show anymore. As a result of persons are so engaged, they typically decrease their defenses to the persuasive content material within the narrative and scale back their counterarguing.”
Whereas individuals typically rated AI tales as simply as persuasive as their human-authored counterparts, the computer-written tales have been not so good as transporting individuals into the world of the narrative.
“AI doesn’t write like a grasp author. That is in all probability excellent news for individuals like Hollywood screenwriters—for now,” Chu mentioned.
Extra info:
Haoran Chu et al, Can AI inform good tales? Narrative transportation and persuasion with ChatGPT, Journal of Communication (2024). DOI: 10.1093/joc/jqae029
Quotation:
Examine: Individuals dislike tales they suppose have been written by AI… even when they have been written by people (2024, October 22)
retrieved 24 October 2024
from https://techxplore.com/information/2024-10-people-stories-written-ai-humans.html
This doc is topic to copyright. Other than any honest dealing for the aim of personal examine or analysis, no
half could also be reproduced with out the written permission. The content material is supplied for info functions solely.